|
|
|
|
|
Formal Objective for the ESRC: |
|
|
|
To develop a conceptual and methodological
approach for understanding the social and cultural construction of
wellbeing in developing countries. |
|
|
|
|
To explain the persistence of poverty. |
|
|
|
and thus to provide input into debates over how
it can be reduced. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
First, to demonstrate that the label of
‘wellbeing’ can be conceptually useful to both academia and policy. |
|
Second, to indicate how, and under what
conditions, it can promote priority to the needs of the poorest?” (from
Gasper 2005) |
|
|
|
|
That poor people are not defined by their
poverty |
|
That poor people can only be understood in
relation to non-poor people |
|
|
|
|
poverty does not preclude wellbeing |
|
poor men, women and children pursue wellbeing |
|
the non-poor in all societies can often
experience considerable wellbeing, alongside others who are chronically
unable to achieve wellbeing |
|
|
|
|
That the objective of international development
(social) policy could, at its most utopian, be described as: |
|
“the
creation of conditions in societies all around the world where people are
able to experience wellbeing.” |
|
|
|
|
Thus the purpose of policies and the raison
d’etre of agencies that generate and implement them is: |
|
|
|
“ to establish the conditions in different
societies within which wellbeing can be pursued and achieved by all people
globally.” |
|
|
|
|
Although a grand and naive statement, it
underpins the Millennium Goals Declaration. |
|
It may have the virtue of allowing us
momentarily to escape entrenched and increasingly sterile ideological debates over the roles of the state,
market, community and individual in the creation of these conditions for
wellbeing |
|
It leaves open the very large question of ‘what
do we mean by wellbeing?’ |
|
|
|
|
|
|
A concept that can span to comprehend notions of
illbeing, and within which the many different notions of poverty can be
accommodated. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
combining a view of the objective circumstances
of a person and their subjective perception of their condition. |
|
Wellbeing as not only an outcome, but as a
‘condition of being’ that arises from the dynamic interplay of outcomes and
processes. |
|
This interplay is firmly located in society and
shaped by social, economic, political, cultural and psychological
processes. |
|
|
|
|
Having – what different resources are people
able to command in order to be pursue their goals. |
|
Doing – what people are able to do with these
resources in order to meet needs and goals. |
|
Thinking – the meaning that they give to the
outcomes they achieve and the processes in which they engage and
particularly their evaluation of their quality of life in relation to their
having and doing. |
|
|
|
|
By locating the wellbeing of the person firmly
in society we emphasise the social construction of meaning. |
|
The wellbeing of any social person depends
crucially on the meanings (norms, values, given facts) through which we
interact with others – it highlights the Inter-subjective. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Wellbeing requires the ‘human being’ to be
placed at the centre point of our analysis. |
|
Although the human is present in all social
science investigations she does not always appear at centre-stage (Douglas
and Ney). |
|
|
|
|
The ‘social being’ as a ‘whole person’. |
|
The social being constituted through relationships
with other persons. |
|
A fundamental and underpinning condition for the
‘social being’ is communication and the transmission of meaning. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Needs can be seen as spanning psychological
needs, which are essential to mental good health, through to social needs,
which are essential for effective and
meaningful participation in social life. |
|
These are not separable and their interplay is
socially constructed in particular societal contexts. |
|
|
|
|
Passive – where the failure to be able to meet
needs results in harm. |
|
Active – where there is active infliction of
harm by another person(s). |
|
Structural – where as a consequence of
structures, although harm is not intended by a persons’ actions it
nevertheless indirectly results. |
|
|
|
|
inappropriate to separate our thinking of
wellbeing outcomes from wellbeing processes. |
|
wellbeing processes are mediated by
relationships over time. |
|
policy intervention is inevitably and
unavoidably about changing processes in particular societies. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The WeD research methodology has six distinct
but interconnected research components. |
|
Each intended to generate data on key elements
of the WeD conceptual framework or the connections between the elements. |
|
A range of different research methods and often
these have been adapted to what is appropriate for the particular research
context.. |
|
Involves the collection of both quantitative and
qualitative data. |
|
Methods sequenced to ensure the accumulation or
deepening of understanding of the social and cultural construction of
well-being in the particular communities and societies being studied. |
|
|
|
|
1. Community Profiles |
|
2. RANQ: The Resources and Needs Questionnaire |
|
3. IES: Income and Expenditure survey |
|
4. QoL: Quality of Life |
|
5. Process research |
|
Around 1,000 rural and 500 urban households
constitute the core population for each country. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Development policy is built on competing visions
of what the good life is. |
|
The inclusion of the subjective dimension in our
definition of wellbeing highlights a challenge as to how all views can be
taken into account or accommodated. |
|
|
|
|
If we are to accept that men, women and children
have some kind of right to have their views of what goals they are trying
to achieve and how they are trying to achieve them taken into account in
our understanding of development and social change, then the social and
political dimensions of the global development project are laid more open. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
The social dimension is that each vision of
well-being is founded in sets of values and those values are generated and
maintained within particular societal and cultural contexts. |
|
The political dimension is revealed in the
working of processes within social units (from household to, community, to
nation, and to the global order), that seek to assert which sets of values
are desirable and superior. |
|
|
|
|
Can studies of wellbeing which build upon the
framework and methodology explained above provide some discipline in
debates over competing views of wellbeing? |
|